Overall I have found almost every aspect of this years Context of Practice module, from the seminars and lectures, to the essay and various visual investigations, deeply rewarding on a practical level in a way which will definitely inform my work moving forward. Much of what I’ve enjoyed this year is analyzing works of animation from a critical perspective and then applying that analytical eye to my own practice; trying to tie what I’ve been doing in CoP2 to what I want to do moving forward, particularly in CoP3 for my dissertation and my Extended Practice next year.
I particularly enjoyed researching and writing for my CoP2 essay, as I found the subject incredibly interesting. This year, partially due to the lectures, has definitely opened me up to the broader context of art history and the ways in which Marxism has influenced practice, which is of great interest to me. With my essay I delved deeper into the ways in which creative practice is structured in terms of workflow, which I feel will be useful in terms of PPP moving forward, as well as being a general area of interest for me.
While I did enjoy writing my essay for the most part I feel I struggled to keep it on topic and relevant to the question, as I often found myself going off on almost conspiratorial tangents about the industry with little relevance to animation, which I had to either cut down or cut out completely. It took me a while to get my essay below 3300 words, as at one point it was around 4000, however I feel with my final essay I cut out the majority of the excess and am generally happy with the finished product. I do feel that I could have referenced a few more theorists to backup my essay, and I also feel I may have focused a little too much on the New Wave in the beginning for the contextual research and could have found more examples/ gone into more detail about movements such as Italian Neorealism and New Hollywood in reference to Auteur Theory.
As for my Visual Journal, I did express interest in the beginning of the module in treating it as an illustration project, with my journal/sketchbook being structured sort of like a tapestry where each page flows into the other in a coherent way. However, due to poor time management on my part this didn’t happen. I am confident in the way my visual journal turned out, but I do feel it is still a missed opportunity. I did incorporate a few illustrations into my final journal, however they were mostly front-loaded, as the deadline I opted for a more collage-y scrapbook style. I feel I made some interesting visual connections with the pages, juxtaposing images I’d printed off with one another to make subtle visual connections in regards to representation.
I am fairly satisfied with my Creative Critical Response as well. This was one thing in which I do feel I managed my time properly and produced a fairly high quality final product. This was also my first time doing Lip-Synch in a 2D animation, having done it in 3D in the past, so there was a slight learning curve which I do feel shows. The animation is so short and tight however I don’t think this is too detrimental to be honest. The animation could have maybe used some more poses for the characters and more inbetweens to make for a smoother, more volumetric sense of weight and movement, however, for the purposes of what I was trying to communicate from my essay I do feel my animation was successful.
Overall I very much look forward to CoP3 and working on my dissertation as I hope my Proposal demonstrates. My aim for next year is to take on board the experiences from this year, the aspects I enjoyed and to better tie them to my studio and professional practice modules. For CoP3 I am definitely interested in tying what I produce for the practical side of my project to my other modules. This year, while successful I do feel the animated response was an afterthought and the essay came first. If I can start thinking about how I can apply what I plan on writing about for CoP3 to my practical now, I feel next year will be more successful in both areas.